
Bitcoin started the movement. The crypto zeitgeist began with Bitcoin along with a technical foundation of blockchain, also called distributed ledger technology (DLT).
Ideological and social foundations based on decentralization, disintermediation of traditional government or corporate organizations has become part of this movement. While financial services is the first “killer app” of blockchain technology, the concept of a distributed ledger has a large number of applications.
Indeed enterprise and inter-enterprise blockchain applications may be able to improve operating efficiencies of established financial services organizations in banking, investment, and capital markets.
At the same time, applications of blockchain are creating new opportunities to the users of the financial industry.
We have been witnessing an evolution of newly emerging applications that can support what some would call a new financial internet.
Bitcoin and an initial blockchain. This initial wave primarily powers a new payment mechanism as well as fund transfers. In traditional online systems, a consumer enters a number, such as a credit card number, into a web browser to effect an online payment. In the new world, a consumer enters other numbers, relating to wallets and digital currency.
In the traditional system centralized servers, often owned and operated by centralized financial intermediaries (payment and credit card processing companies), effected transactions between stores and banks.
In the new world of online payments, digital currency via blockchain can enable payments directly between consumers and stores -- bypassing credit card companies and banks.
Pragmatic benefits of lower costs, as well as opening up banking by cell phones to people around the world, become a motivational factor for the underbanked globally. This payments and funds transfer stage will continue to grow as more and more establishments accept Bitcoin, and perhaps other digital currency, as payments.
Although Bitcoin and basic blockchain were fine for payments, investing in new companies often involved conditionality relating to escrow, lockup rules, and more. A new generation of blockchain enabled this conditionality via smart contracts.
Ethereum, and their ERC20 tokens, provided the initial technical foundations in late 2016. Other vendors followed with their own solutions.
As a result of smart contracts, companies began raising money in 2017 via Initial Coin Offerings and associated white papers. Larger numbers of ICOs evolved in the first half of 2017 -- many in Asia Pacific -- but most did not comply with U.S. regulations.
By the summer of 2017, the turning point began.
The amount being raised started to compete with the amount raised by U.S. venture capital companies. Additionally, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated and published their landmark DAO Report that addressed the topic of unregulated securities and ICOs.
Through the fall of 2017, even more was raised (up to $3.5 to $5.6 billion by the end of 2017), and regulators around the world increased their scrutiny and enforcement. China took an extreme approach shutting down ICOs and cryptocurrency exchanges in September of 2017.
In the United States, the SEC was increasingly viewing most offerings as being securities.
In the spring of 2018, many subpoenas were sent to out to industry participants including attorneys engaged in the facilitation of ICOs.
Today, there are increasing pressures for issuers to comply with existing regulation, and to seek improved efficiency and returns. This is driving a third wave of a new financial internet. This wave is starting in 2018 and may be over over in just a few of years.
The Security Token Industry is evolving very quickly - but there remains a great deal of confusion.
There are definitely gray areas in both the marketing messages of vendors as well as the underlying business models. Futher, the messaging and business models mean are not at all “immutable” but rather are evolving as part of the larger security token ecosystem.
So what then are the key dimensions?
A key aspect of the third wave is the maturation of the industry, and the integrity of its practices and operations.
There are currently two definitions that you will hear about in the media and at events. The Security Token Academy codifies these definitions, generationally, as:
Specifically, KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti Money Laundering) mechanisms will be automated to different degrees based on a new layer of technology that can sit on top of smart contracts. Through the electronic codification of KYC and AML rules on a country by country basis, cross border transactions become more efficient and more viable. The Security Token 2.0 generation begins in 2018 and will evolve in future years.
Some of course may quibble about this 2.0 terminology believing it should be 1.5. But the elements of what will be in 2.0 are not necessarily all developed by vendors. Automation of dividend management, lockups, and more are also becoming part of the solution set. A key issue will be what will be the difference between 2.0 and a possible 3.0 generation of security tokens.
Although some early aspects the security tokens appeared in 2017 through a few Reg D offerings compliant with SEC Regulations, the broader Security Token enabled third wave will really starting in 2018 for three key reasons.
First, in 2018 we will see more and more U.S. token offering being compliant with SEC Regulations.
Second, the evolution of newer generations of Security Tokens will better enable identity management, cross border trading via KYC and AML mechanisms.
Third, the emergence of security token trading organizations in the second half of 2018 that will enable the trading of security tokens that are unlocked from 2017 Reg D restrictions.
So the key pieces of the Security Token industry are starting to fall in place in 2018. More components will need to be addressed, but 2018 is the year when major foundational elements will be established.
SecurityTokenAcademy.com is a platform for information about the new world of Security Tokens. We are not a registered broker-dealer or investment advisor. We are not a Security Token or blockchain platform, nor can you purchase or invest through our website. We do not offer investment or purchase advice; nor do we endorse or recommend purchases or investments in any Security Token, and we don’t tell you if any purchase or investment is suitable for you. Additionally all investments entail risk, and investments in start-ups as well as Security Tokens involve a potentially greater risk.
Copyright © 2019 SecurityTokenAcademy.com®. All Rights Reserved.